The post is about what to check for in the title so that you can immediately find out if it’s fake. You already know the title is fake.

Not only are many lawyers conspiring criminals, but a huge percentage of lawyers here simply do not even KNOW the law even for simple things such as citizenship issues of people born here. I would trust NO Philippine lawyer as far as I can throw my car.

If you cannot trust lawyer, who can you trust? Then the question is, Why even bother buying a piece of property in the Philippines?

Majority of them are Liar not Lawyer…as long as they can make money, ang mali nagagawa nilang tama at ang tama pwede nilang gawing mali.

R. 103727 and G

Trust and/or kindness makes the average Filipino’s eyes light up because those two traits are a sign of stupidity in the Philippines and you will get stung. If the seller shows signs of being insulted because you insist on going over their documents with a fine tooth comb, it might be a good idea to walk away.

what about checking on the decision of Judge Agana under Civil Case: LR 3957-P (DWCA) which was AFFIRMED AND CONFIRMED by SUPREME COURT EN BANC DECISION under #G.R.NO.103727 and #G.R https://hookupdate.net/sugar-daddies-canada/montreal/.NO.106496 (with reference to pages 80 and 125 of the case LR 3957-P [DWCA] dated February 4, 1972 under Judge Enrique A. Agana) so…now the question remains the same: HOW CAN A TCT (TRANSFER CERTIFICATE OF TITLE) DERIVED FROM OCT’s (ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE) BE LEGAL IF AND WHEN OCT’s WAS CANCELLED, NULL AND VOID “AB INITIO” as per Civil Case No. LR-3957-P (DWCA) and CONFIRMED and AFFIRMED by SUPREME COURT EN-BANC DECISION under G.R.106496.

If by “the above cited Philippine Jurisprudence”, you mean the above blog post, I want to clarify an important point that you may have sorely missed.

Actually reading the above blog post, even just for a minute, will help you see that Ms. Fortsätt läsa →